Plants and Animals

Lithobates palustris Pickerel frog

species photo
Susan Elliott, iNaturalist CC BY-NC some rights reserved
species photo
Marc Faucher, iNaturalist CC BY-NC 4.0 some rights reserved
species photo
Steve King, iNaturalist CC BY-NC some rights reserved

Key Characteristics

The Pickerel Frog is a medium to large-sized frog (adult body length 5.1 to 7.6 cm) that is light brown, tan, gray, or olive green in color with two rows of squarish dark brown spots, often outlined in black, running down its back between its light-colored dorsolateral folds. This frog looks similar to the Northern Leopard Frog but can be differentiated by the squarish spots arranged in two rows, as mentioned, and by the bright yellow or orange color present on the groin and undersides of its hind legs (leopard frogs are white in the same area). It has a whitish belly and throat, and a light line along the upper lip. Its breeding call is a low-pitched, snore-like croak similar to the Northern Leopard Frog’s call but the Pickerel Frog’s call is shorter and weaker and lacks the low grunts at the end of the call.

Status and Rank

US Status: No Status/Not Listed
State Status: SC - Special Concern (rare or uncertain; not legally protected)
Global Rank: G5 - Secure
State Rank: S3S4 - Rank is uncertain, ranging from vulnerable to apparently secure

Occurrences

CountyNumber of OccurrencesYear Last Observed
Alcona 1 2000
Allegan 4 2003
Antrim 1 1979
Arenac 2 1998
Baraga 4 2013
Barry 5 2014
Benzie 3 2008
Berrien 7 2017
Calhoun 6 2018
Cass 3 2018
Charlevoix 4 1996
Cheboygan 2 1989
Chippewa 2 2005
Clare 1 1925
Clinton 1 2002
Crawford 3 1924
Delta 2 2018
Eaton 3 2015
Emmet 3 2009
Genesee 5 2015
Gladwin 1 1947
Gogebic 1 1997
Grand Traverse 5 2009
Gratiot 1 2008
Hillsdale 2 2001
Houghton 3 2017
Huron 4 2007
Ingham 4 2018
Ionia 1 1947
Iosco 4 2008
Iron 4 1997
Isabella 4 2009
Jackson 9 2018
Kalamazoo 8 2018
Kalkaska 6 2018
Kent 5 2017
Keweenaw 1 1999
Lake 3 1997
Lapeer 5 2015
Leelanau 2 2005
Lenawee 2 2006
Livingston 4 2003
Luce 2 2008
Mackinac 1 2017
Macomb 1 1996
Manistee 7 2017
Marquette 5 2005
Mason 6 2018
Mecosta 3 2016
Menominee 4 2018
Midland 1 2002
Missaukee 1 2001
Monroe 4 2018
Montcalm 4 2014
Montmorency 3 2009
Muskegon 2 2000
Newaygo 4 2017
Oakland 10 2018
Oceana 1 2013
Osceola 3 2015
Oscoda 1 1924
Otsego 5 2008
Ottawa 1 2018
Roscommon 3 2015
Saginaw 1 2013
Sanilac 1 2004
Schoolcraft 1 2001
St. Clair 3 2018
St. Joseph 2 2017
Tuscola 2 2008
Van Buren 4 2018
Washtenaw 6 2018
Wayne 2 2005
Wexford 2 2016

Information is summarized from MNFI's database of rare species and community occurrences. Data may not reflect true distribution since much of the state has not been thoroughly surveyed.

Habitat

Pickerel Frogs occur in a variety of freshwater aquatic and wetland habitats, including fens, bogs, marshes, shrubby/open wet meadows, forested wetlands, ponds, slow-moving streams, springs, and backwater sloughs or swamps. In other parts of its range, this species also has been found in karst topography and caves. The species has been reported to prefer habitats with cool, clear water and avoid areas with polluted or stagnant water. These frogs also seem to prefer the margins of aquatic habitats with dense herbaceous vegetation, such as grassy stream banks and where streams or springs flow into bogs, marshes, or weedy ponds. Upon spring emergence, Pickerel Frogs move to shallow, quiet, warm water for breeding. Breeding habitat includes forested ponds, vernal pools, bog ponds, stream pools, impoundments, and flooded ditches. After breeding, they may migrate to nearby grassy meadows, fields, and open woods, but they tend to not move as far from water as Northern Leopard Frogs. Pickerel Frogs spend the winter buried in the mud or beneath submerged logs or rocks on the bottoms or in the deeper parts of streams, springs, ponds, and bogs.

Natural Community Types

For each species, lists of natural communities were derived from review of the nearly 6,500 element occurrences in the MNFI database, in addition to herbarium label data for some taxa. In most cases, at least one specimen record exists for each listed natural community. For certain taxa, especially poorly collected or extirpated species of prairie and savanna habitats, natural community lists were derived from inferences from collection sites and habitat preferences in immediately adjacent states (particularly Indiana and Illinois). Natural communities are not listed for those species documented only from altered or ruderal habitats in Michigan, especially for taxa that occur in a variety of habitats outside of the state.

Natural communities are not listed in order of frequency of occurrence, but are rather derived from the full set of natural communities, organized by Ecological Group. In many cases, the general habitat descriptions should provide greater clarity and direction to the surveyor. In future versions of the Rare Species Explorer, we hope to incorporate natural community fidelity ranks for each taxon.

Management Recommendations

Maintaining suitable wetland habitats and connectivity among breeding, summer, and overwintering habitats are critical for conservation of extant Pickerel Frog populations. Because this species appears to prefer cool, clear waters and may be intolerant of pollution, avoiding or minimizing activities that result in siltation andr runoff of herbicides, insecticides and other chemicals and maintaining natural vegetative buffers around aquatic and wetland habitats would benefit this species. This species also has been found to be susceptible to ranaviruses, a disease that may cause mass mortality, and a “red-leg” disease/bacterial infection. Disinfecting or decontaminating footwear, supplies, and equipment before use in occupied sites can reduce the potential for introducing these and other diseases to populations. Road mortality may be a threat to some populations. Avoiding construction of new roads, closing existing roads, and installing barrier fencing along roads or ecopassages under roads can reduce road mortality where it is an issue. Efforts to obtain information on the species’ current status and distribution, population sizes or abundance, ecology, and site-specific threats and management needs are needed to inform development and implementation of effective management and conservation strategies for this species.

Active Period

Active from first week of April to fourth week of October

Breeding from first week of April to fourth week of May

Survey Methods

Effective methods for surveying this species include breeding call surveys and visual encounter surveys. Breeding call surveys consist of listening for calls of adult males in the evening and at night (i.e., from sunset to 12:00 or 1:00 am) during the breeding season. Breeding and calling generally start as early as April, but can be delayed due to cold weather or start earlier during warmer springs, and extend into May (or early June) in Michigan, especially in the northern part of the state. Call surveys should be conducted on multiple nights during the breeding season and should be conducted during appropriate weather conditions. Humidity and cloud cover are not critical, but a sudden drop in air temperature will cause most frogs to stop calling. Visual encounter surveys can be conducted throughout the active period, especially during the breeding season, during and immediately following rain events, and on humid summer evenings/nights. In the spring, individuals are active during the day and night, but may become more nocturnal in the summer. Visual surveys consist of walking slowly through suitable habitat, overturning cover objects (e.g., logs/woody debris, rocks, etc.), inspecting retreats, and looking for individuals on the surface or under cover. Visual encounter surveys, sampling with a dip net or seine net, and trapping with minnow traps are effective methods for surveying and monitoring egg masses and larvae of this species.

Breeding call surveys

Survey Period: From first week of April to fourth week of May

Time of Day: Evening
Humidity: Humid
Cloud Cover: Overcast
Air Temperature: Above 60 degrees
Precipitation: Rainy
Wind: No Wind
Survey Method Comment: Warm (above 55-65oF), cloudy evenings/nights with little or no wind and high humidity or light rain/drizzle are optimal. Frogs can also be heard during other conditions as well. Avoid surveying on cold, windy nights or during steady or heavy rain.

Visual encounter surveys

Survey Period: From first week of April to fourth week of September

Time of Day: Daytime
Humidity: Humid
Air Temperature: Above 60 degrees
Precipitation: Just after rain
Wind: No Wind
Survey Method Comment: Visual surveys can be done anytime during the active season and during the day or evening/night but recommend conducting immediately prior to and during the breeding season, during and immediately following rain events when possible, and on humid evenings/nights in the summer.

References

Survey References

  • Graeter, G.L., K.A. Buhlmann, L.R. Wilkinson, and J.W. Gibbons (editors). 2013. Inventory and Monitoring: Recommended Techniques for Reptiles and Amphibians. Partners in Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Technical Publication IM-1, Birmingham, AL. 321 pp.
  • Heyer, W.R., M.A. Donnelly, R.W. McDiarmid, L.C. Hayek, and M.S. Foster, eds. 1994. Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C. 364pp.
  • Sargent, L.G. 2000. Frog and toad population monitoring in Michigan. The Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science 107(3): 195-199.

Technical References

  • Harding, J.H., and D.A. Mifsud. 2017. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Great Lakes Region, Revised Edition. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI. 408 pp.
  • Hoverman, J.T., M.J.Gray, and D.L. Miller. 2010. Anuran susceptibilities to ranaviruses: role of species identity, exposure route, and a novel virus isolate. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 89: 97-107.
  • Tarter, A., and J.D. Willson. 2020. Pickerel Frog (Rana [Lithobates] palustris).  <https://srelherp.uga.edu/anurans/buffow.htm> Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC. Accessed 18 Mar 2020.
  • Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 2015. 2015-2025 Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan. Madison, WI.