Plants and Animals
Cambarunio iris Rainbow
Key Characteristics
The rainbow is a small (to 3 inches), elongate mussel with a relatively thin shell. The beak sculpture has 4 to 6 distinct double-looped bars. The cardinal teeth are small, triangular, and somewhat divergent; there are 2 in the left valve and 2 in the right valve. The shell is yellow or greenish-yellow with dark green rays. The nacre is silvery white and highly iridescent on the posterior half.
Status and Rank
US Status: No Status/Not Listed
State Status: SC - Special Concern (rare or uncertain; not legally protected)
Global Rank: GNR - Not ranked
State Rank: S3 - Vulnerable
Occurrences
| County | Number of Occurrences | Year Last Observed |
|---|---|---|
| Alger | 1 | 1983 |
| Allegan | 1 | Historical |
| Alpena | 4 | 1971 |
| Arenac | 1 | Historical |
| Barry | 4 | 2018 |
| Berrien | 2 | 1934 |
| Branch | 2 | 2000 |
| Calhoun | 16 | 2019 |
| Cass | 2 | 2009 |
| Clinton | 7 | 2019 |
| Eaton | 8 | 2018 |
| Genesee | 3 | 2019 |
| Gladwin | 1 | 1926 |
| Gratiot | 7 | 2019 |
| Hillsdale | 24 | 2019 |
| Huron | 8 | 2005 |
| Ingham | 12 | 2015 |
| Ionia | 15 | 2021 |
| Iosco | 1 | Historical |
| Isabella | 10 | 2020 |
| Jackson | 22 | 2018 |
| Kalamazoo | 10 | 2022 |
| Kent | 10 | 2020 |
| Lapeer | 2 | 1926 |
| Lenawee | 16 | 2004 |
| Livingston | 6 | 2019 |
| Macomb | 21 | 2018 |
| Mecosta | 2 | 2002 |
| Menominee | 1 | 1927 |
| Midland | 5 | 2020 |
| Missaukee | 1 | 2002 |
| Monroe | 17 | 2018 |
| Montcalm | 8 | 2015 |
| Muskegon | 1 | 1936 |
| Oakland | 15 | 2023 |
| Ogemaw | 1 | 1926 |
| Ottawa | 1 | 1929 |
| Roscommon | 4 | 2002 |
| Saginaw | 8 | 2011 |
| Sanilac | 5 | 2009 |
| Shiawassee | 6 | 2001 |
| St. Clair | 24 | 2020 |
| St. Joseph | 13 | 2016 |
| Tuscola | 7 | 2004 |
| Van Buren | 4 | 2009 |
| Washtenaw | 12 | 2019 |
| Wayne | 12 | 2019 |
Information is summarized from MNFI's database of rare species and community occurrences. Data may not reflect true distribution since much of the state has not been thoroughly surveyed.
Habitat
The rainbow occurs in coarse sand or gravel in small to medium streams.
Specific Habitat Needs
Sand and gravel substrates needed in: Great lake, littoral, benthic; Inland lake, littoral, benthic; Inland lake, pelagic, benthic;
Sand and gravel substrates; moderate currents needed in: Headwater stream (1st-2nd order), riffle; Headwater stream (1st-2nd order), pool; Headwater stream (1st-2nd order), run; Mainstem stream (3rd-4th order), pool; Mainstem stream (3rd-4th order), run; Mainstem stream (3rd-4th order), riffle;
Natural Community Types
- Great lake, littoral, benthic
- Headwater stream (1st-2nd order), riffle
- Headwater stream (1st-2nd order), pool
- Headwater stream (1st-2nd order), run
- Inland lake, littoral, benthic
- Inland lake, pelagic, benthic
- Mainstem stream (3rd-4th order), pool
- Mainstem stream (3rd-4th order), run
- Mainstem stream (3rd-4th order), riffle
For each species, lists of natural communities were derived from review of the nearly 6,500 element occurrences in the MNFI database, in addition to herbarium label data for some taxa. In most cases, at least one specimen record exists for each listed natural community. For certain taxa, especially poorly collected or extirpated species of prairie and savanna habitats, natural community lists were derived from inferences from collection sites and habitat preferences in immediately adjacent states (particularly Indiana and Illinois). Natural communities are not listed for those species documented only from altered or ruderal habitats in Michigan, especially for taxa that occur in a variety of habitats outside of the state.
Natural communities are not listed in order of frequency of occurrence, but are rather derived from the full set of natural communities, organized by Ecological Group. In many cases, the general habitat descriptions should provide greater clarity and direction to the surveyor. In future versions of the Rare Species Explorer, we hope to incorporate natural community fidelity ranks for each taxon.
Management Recommendations
Like other mussels, threats to the rainbow include: natural flow alterations, siltation, channel disturbance, point and non-point source pollution, and exotic species. Maintenance or establishment of vegetated riparian buffers can help protect mussel habitats from many of their threats. Control of zebra mussels is critical to preserving native mussels. And as with all mussels, protection of their hosts habitat is also crucial.
Survey Methods
Glass-bottom bucket less than waist deep water
Survey Period: From first week of June to first week of October
SCUBA searches
Survey Period: From first week of June to first week of October
Snorkeling searches
Survey Period: From first week of June to first week of October
References
Survey References
- Cummings, K.S. and C.A. Mayer. 1992. Field Guide to Freshwater Mussels of the Midwest. Illinois Natural History Survey Manual 5, Champaign. 194pp.
- Strayer, D.L. and D.R. Smith. 2003. A Guide to Sampling Freshwater Mussel Populations. American Fisheries Society Monograph 8, Bethesda. 103pp.
Technical References
- Burch, J.B. 1994. Mollusk: Species Accounts. Pages 395-410 in D.C. Evers, ed. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife of Michigan. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
- Cummings, K.S. and C.A. Mayer. 1992. Field Guide to Freshwater Mussels of the Midwest. Illinois Natural History Survey Manual 5, Champaign. 194pp.
- Dillon, R.T. Jr. 2000. The Ecology of Freshwater Molluscs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 509pp.
- Smith, P.W. 1971. Illinois streams: A classification based on their fishes and an analysis of factors responsible for the disappearance of native species. Illinois Natural History Survey Biological Notes 76: 1-14.
- Watters, G.T. 1993. A guide to the freshwater mussels of Ohio. Revised Edition. The Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus. 106 pages.