Plants and Animals
Noturus miurus Brindled madtom
Key Characteristics
The brindled madtom is a stocky fish that becomes strongly laterally compressed behind the anal fin with four dark conspicuous saddle marks on its back. The adipose fin is connected to the caudal fin and the last saddle band reaches the edge of this fin. The dorsal fin is well head of the midpoint of the body and has a black tip. There are no light pair of spots near the dorsal fin base.
Status and Rank
US Status: No Status/Not Listed
State Status: T - Threatened (legally protected)
Global Rank: G5 - Secure
State Rank: S2 - Imperiled
Occurrences
| County | Number of Occurrences | Year Last Observed |
|---|---|---|
| Hillsdale | 2 | 2000 |
| Jackson | 2 | 1984 |
| Lenawee | 2 | 2012 |
| Livingston | 10 | 2009 |
| Macomb | 6 | 2015 |
| Monroe | 3 | 2009 |
| Oakland | 3 | 2005 |
| St. Clair | 3 | 2020 |
| Washtenaw | 14 | 2018 |
| Wayne | 2 | 2004 |
Information is summarized from MNFI's database of rare species and community occurrences. Data may not reflect true distribution since much of the state has not been thoroughly surveyed.
Habitat
In the Midwest, the brindled madtom is typically found in slow-moving rivers or streams primarily in pools below riffles. They are found over soft substrates with an abundance of stones, organic matter, woody debris, and/or vegetation in which they hide.
Specific Habitat Needs
Soft substrates, often near macrophytes needed in: Mainstem stream (3rd-4th order), pool; Mainstem stream (3rd-4th order), riffle; River (5th-6th order), pool; River (5th-6th order), riffle;
Soft substrates, usually near macrophytes or an abundance of leaves and twigs needed in: Inland lake, littoral, benthic;
Natural Community Types
- Bog
- Coastal plain marsh
- Emergent marsh
- Inland lake, littoral, benthic
- Intermittent wetland
For each species, lists of natural communities were derived from review of the nearly 6,500 element occurrences in the MNFI database, in addition to herbarium label data for some taxa. In most cases, at least one specimen record exists for each listed natural community. For certain taxa, especially poorly collected or extirpated species of prairie and savanna habitats, natural community lists were derived from inferences from collection sites and habitat preferences in immediately adjacent states (particularly Indiana and Illinois). Natural communities are not listed for those species documented only from altered or ruderal habitats in Michigan, especially for taxa that occur in a variety of habitats outside of the state.
Natural communities are not listed in order of frequency of occurrence, but are rather derived from the full set of natural communities, organized by Ecological Group. In many cases, the general habitat descriptions should provide greater clarity and direction to the surveyor. In future versions of the Rare Species Explorer, we hope to incorporate natural community fidelity ranks for each taxon.
Management Recommendations
Michigan is the northern edge of range for the brindled madtom. This species is declining everywhere. Increased turbidity, siltation, and stream flow alterations have likely let to the decline of this species. They are also intolerant to toxic pollutants. It is important to maintain or establish broad vegetated riparian buffers to help ameliorate some of these threats. Additionally, this madtom competes for cover and spawning areas with the round goby, an introduced species. Hence management for this species must consider that of the goby.
Survey Methods
In small streams a backpack shocker is most appropriate. In larger rivers, a barge/boat shocker should be used.
References
Survey References
- Elzinga, C.L., D.W. Salzer, and J.W. Willoughby. 1998. Measuring and Monitoring Plant Populations. The Nature Conservancy and Bureau of Land Management, Denver. BLM Technical Reference 1730-1. 477pp.
- Goff, G.F., G.A. Dawson, and J.J. Rochow. 1982. Site examination for Threatened and Endangered plant species. Environmental Management 6(4): 307-316
- Nelson, J.R. 1984. Rare Plant Field Survey Guidelines. In: J.P. Smith and R. York. Inventory of rare and endangered vascular plants of California. 3rd Ed. California Native Plant Society, Berkeley. 174pp.
- Nelson, J.R. 1986. Rare Plant Surveys: Techniques For Impact Assessment. Natural Areas Journal 5(3):18-30.
- Nelson, J.R. 1987. Rare Plant Surveys: Techniques for Impact Assessment. In: Conservation and management of rare and endangered plants. Ed. T.S. Elias. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento. 8pp.
Technical References
- Braun, E. L. 1967. The Monocotyledoneae of Ohio. Cat-tails to Orchids. Ohio State University Press, Columbus. 464pp.
- Crow, G.E. and C.B. Hellquist. 2000. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Northeastern North America. Volume 1. Pteridophytes, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms: Dicotyledons. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 480pp.
- Flora of North America Editorial Committee. 2002. Flora of North America, North of Mexico. Volume 23: Magnoliaphyta: Commelinidae (in part): Cyperaceae. Oxford University Press, New York. 608pp.
- Gleason, H. A., and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. 2nd Ed. The New York Botanical Garden, New York, New York.
- Godfrey, R.K. and Wooten. 1981. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Southeastern United States. Dicotyledons. University of Georgia Press, Athens. 712pp.
- Gray, A. 1950. Gray's Manual of Botany; eighth ed. Van Nostrand Reinghold, New York. 1632pp.
- Holmgren, N.H. 1998. Illustrated Companion to Gleason and Cronquist's Manual. Illustrations of the vascular plants of Northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx. 937pp.
- Swink, F. and G. Wilhelm. 1994. Plants of the Chicago Region, 4th ed. Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis. 921pp.
- Voss, E. G. 1972. Michigan Flora. Part I. Gymnosperms and Monocots. Bulletin of the Cranbrook Institute of Science and University of Michigan Herbarium. 488pp.