Erebia discoidalis
Red-disked alpine

Key Characteristics

Upper surfaces are dark brown with a large dull reddish patch on the forewing. Undersurface edges are frosted with bluish gray but without distinct markings. Caterpillars are green with lighter lines.

Status and Rank

  • State Status: SC
  • State Rank: S2S3
  • Global Rank: G5

Occurrences

County NameNumber of OccurrencesYear Last Observed
Baraga21968
Dickinson11983
Iron11988
Marquette11983
Distribution map for Erebia discoidalis

Updated 7/21/2017. Information is summarized from MNFI's database of rare species and community occurrences. Data may not reflect true distribution since much of the state has not been thoroughly surveyed.

Habitat

Large sphagnum bogs with abundant cotton-grass and grassy meadows. Wide variety of open situations including pine forest glades, dry ridge tops, and sedge marshes. Major food plant is bluegrass (Poa sp.).

Specific Habitat Needs

Host plant needed in Northern wet meadow, Patterned fen, Poor fen, Bog, Muskeg, Pine barrens

Natural Community Types

Methodology

For each species, lists of natural communities were derived from review of the nearly 6,500 element occurrences in the MNFI database, in addition to herbarium label data for some taxa. In most cases, at least one specimen record exists for each listed natural community. For certain taxa, especially poorly collected or extirpated species of prairie and savanna habitats, natural community lists were derived from inferences from collection sites and habitat preferences in immediately adjacent states (particularly Indiana and Illinois). Natural communities are not listed for those species documented only from altered or ruderal habitats in Michigan, especially for taxa that occur in a variety of habitats outside of the state.

Natural communities are not listed in order of frequency of occurrence, but are rather derived from the full set of natural communities, organized by Ecological Group. In many cases, the general habitat descriptions should provide greater clarity and direction to the surveyor. In future versions of the Rare Species Explorer, we hope to incorporate natural community fidelity ranks for each taxon.

Management

Little is known about this species' status, distribution, life history, ecology and threats. Thus, specific management recommendations can not be provided at this time. Threats to this species may include climate change and use of pesticides and herbicides. In general, surveys are needed to determine this species' current status and distribution in the state. Research to obtain information on this species' life history and ecology and assess threats to its conservation also is warranted. The sites at which this species has been documented should be protected and maintained. Adequate and suitable habitat at these sites need to be maintained including sufficient densities of the species' host plants. The habitats with which this species is associated and the ecological processes needed to maintain these natural communities need to be protected and managed. This might include maintaining or restoring hydrologic regimes (e.g., protecting groundwater recharge areas, avoiding or limiting surface water inputs from drainage ditches and agricultural fields), controlling invasive species, and restoring fire (e.g., prescribed burning) or other natural disturbance regimes.

Active Period

Flight from third week of May to fourth week of May

Survey Methods

The best way to survey for this species is by conducting visual meander surveys which consists of checking for this species near larval food plants, on tree sap flows, and in mud puddles.

Page Citation

Michigan Natural Features Inventory. 2007. Rare Species Explorer (Web Application). Available online at http://mnfi.anr.msu.edu/explorer [Accessed Oct 21, 2017]

More Information

See MNFI Species Abstract

References

Survey References

Technical References

Facebook link